Skip to Content
Business professional standing against a government building's pillar.
Article

The impact of Brazil’s new OECD transfer pricing rules on international business

July 30, 2024 / 4 min read

Brazil’s transfer pricing changes will more closely align with OECD guidelines, but the modifications could strain a system that previously relied on calculations, fixed margins, and safe harbors. Taxpayers should be aware of transfer pricing differences.

Note: This article was co-authored by Praxity members Maria Jose Gonzalez de Dios (JA Del Rio) and Daniel Affonseca (VBR Brasil).

With a series of laws and regulations published in 2023, the Brazilian government significantly modified its transfer pricing rules to align more closely with Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines. At the core of the OECD approach is the idea that businesses need to price intercompany transactions using an “arm’s-length” principle that mirrors what unrelated third parties would do in similar circumstances.

The new rules represent a drastic change from Brazil’s past approach to transfer pricing. The move from a formulaic approach with fixed margins, calculations, and safe harbors to the OECD’s more open-ended calculation based on comparable market prices will require a detailed economic analysis and functional, asset, and risk assessments to substantiate a business’s transfer pricing policy. The change warrants a closer look at the details of Brazil’s new policy, as well as consideration of the impact the new rules will have on Brazilian companies with related entities in the United States (which has only a reciprocal agreement with Brazil on taxes, not a tax treaty) and Mexico (which has a tax treaty with Brazil).

An overview of Brazil’s new transfer pricing regime

As of Jan. 1, 2024, Brazil’s new transfer pricing rules are in full effect. Businesses had the option of voluntary participation in 2023, but only a few (if any) have elected such an option. The government expanded from just two comparison methods available under its old rules — comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) and cost-plus method (CPM) — to a more extensive range of methods approved by the OECD.

The OECD’s arm’s-length principle is a much more open and interpretive standard that could be challenging for Brazil’s tax authority (RFB) to enforce in a system that has traditionally focused on objective written requirements spelled out in laws. This could lead to an increase in litigation around transfer pricing that could prove costly to entities subject to the Brazilian rules. The problem could be exacerbated for U.S. multinationals with Brazil operations as the lack of a tax treaty precludes resolving these disputes through mutual agreement procedures.

The rules require the taxpayer to provide three sets of data files to the RFB. A country-by-country file typically includes items such as income with related and nonrelated parties, capital, accumulated profits, and employees and full-time equivalents.

The master file focuses on organizational structure, business operations, intangibles, and the global tax position of the group. The local file covers local entity structures and business lines, controlled transactions, and financial information.

One of the challenges in Brazil is that much of this information is provided to the authorities via invoice reporting systems that require businesses to share invoices with the RFB in real time. This gives the RFB thorough knowledge of the company’s pricing in Brazil, as well as detailed information on comparable pricing among the other businesses in the system that can’t be shared with taxpayers. Taxpayers must prove that transactions are arm’s length based on publicly available data about market prices. As a result, taxpayers are constrained by the lack of public data while the RFB might try to use the private taxpayer data it collects, which can’t be shared with other taxpayers (known as “secret comparables.”)

Similarities and differences between Brazil, Mexico, and United States transfer pricing rules

The new Brazilian rules align with U.S. and Mexican rules in some ways and differ elsewhere. Some of the key areas to consider include:

Next steps

Multinational organizations with entities in Brazil should evaluate their transfer pricing processes to make sure they are in compliance. Affected businesses will need to monitor legal challenges to the RFB’s enforcement of the rules for the foreseeable future, as concepts like “arms-length” and the DEMPE intangible rules may be subject to widely varying interpretations. Given the significance of this change from Brazil’s previous transfer pricing regime, it’s likely that these rules will be challenged and adapted for years to come.

Related Thinking

Aerial view of shipping port.
August 19, 2024

Should your business nearshore operations back to North America?

Article 10 min read
Two business professionals standing on the stairs of a government building discussing OECD transfer pricing rules.
April 30, 2024

How Brazil’s adoption of OECD transfer pricing rules will impact international business

Webinar 1 hour watch
Business professionals in a modern conference room discussing transfer pricing.
September 9, 2024

Transfer pricing for middle-market companies: One size doesn’t fit all

Article 5 min read